Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

August 31 2017

PapsT
0983 b667 500
Reposted fromczinok czinok viastraycat straycat
PapsT

August 28 2017

PapsT
5227 d35f 500
Reposted fromlokrund2015 lokrund2015 viabollabolla bollabolla
PapsT
5401 40b2 500
Reposted fromaanisiowe aanisiowe vianoisetales noisetales
PapsT
7951 adc3 500
Reposted fromtichga tichga viastraycat straycat
PapsT
1155 876a 500
Machtrausch
Reposted frommartinperscheid martinperscheid viastraycat straycat
PapsT
1150 dd51 500
Frauen in typischen Männerberufen
Reposted frommartinperscheid martinperscheid viastraycat straycat
PapsT
Reposted fromFlau Flau viastraycat straycat
PapsT
Reposted fromFlau Flau viaLanou Lanou
PapsT
PapsT
erm ja gut man kann auch Sachen aus zusammen hängen reissen... besonders schlimm ist es wenn bei beiden das datum dran steht (Aussage Schulz 24.8.17 und Abstimmung vom 27.3.15). Die Maut ist bisher noch nicht da oder?! Dementsprechend ist seine Aussage nicht falsch...
0227 de51 500
Reposted fromUnpretty Unpretty viaiambabsi iambabsi

July 01 2017

PapsT
9006 2bfb 500

So funktioniert Politik: Mit der "Ehe für alle" die Leute ablenken, und gleichzeitig das Zensurgesetz verabschieden...
Reposted fromswissfondue swissfondue viadnymartinson dnymartinson

June 18 2017

PapsT
9909 585e 500
Reposted fromzciach zciach viaEineFragevonStil EineFragevonStil
PapsT
PapsT
2200 02a0
Brazilian supermarket
Reposted fromvolldost volldost viajagger jagger
PapsT
2963 e839 500
Reposted fromSardion Sardion viajigglybro jigglybro

June 12 2017

3422 71c1
Reposted fromEquion Equion viadnymartinson dnymartinson
PapsT
5241 c5df 500
Reposted fromtichga tichga viadnymartinson dnymartinson
1282 89bf

imin-loveanon:

aglassroseneverfades:

pmastamonkmonk:

schnerp:

feminism-is-radical:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

houroftheanarchistwolf:

aawb:

starsapphire:

is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what

That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING

What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?

It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot. 

image

It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. 

I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?

And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. 

Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.

We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine. 

What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do.

This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks: 

imageimageimage

Also: 

image

He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.

You can see her butthole for chrissakes

I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.

Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.

Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.

Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.

Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.

This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.

@angstymelon

Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl